download dxo pureraw 3 vs topaz photo ai

Not making any excuses, but as a Topaz Beta Tester I can say that have not come across the degree of artefacts that you are describing, so I find it somewhat surprising. Just curious, as to what versions of Denoise AI and Sharpen AI you were using? AI Clear is its simplest and oldest NR model.

My apologies to those who complained of artifacts earlier and where I sort of smirked. Both TOPAZ products produced the worst artefacts I have ever seen! They covered the entire image and no amount of tweaking and adjustment would get rid of it. I got the wild idea that I'd send the OWS jpg through Denoise AI (AI Clear) and Sharpen AI to see if I could get closer to PR's overall sharpness. They were comparable in Vignetting, Distortion, and Chromatic Aberration, but PureRaw was significantly better at lens sharpening. So, I had an ORF that I processed as automatically as I could in Workspace, exported it to a jpg, and then took the same ORF and sent it through PureRaw. Just for fun, I decided to stack PureRaw against Olympus Workspace, even though it doesn't support Linear DNG. I'm probably going to buy DXO Pure Raw while it is at a reduced introductory price even though I own the Topaz products. I'd say, buy and use whatever feels right. Clear AI on full auto, isn't QUITE as sharp as the DXO, but I do have the ability to tweak and adjust the Clear AI version. I don't know how many times, I just zoomed in. At this level of magnification they look pretty much alike The Lens Fun Database that ACDSee uses for corrections doesn't allow for that combination, but DXO handles it quite well.īelow, is the DXO PureRaw version and the Topaz DeNoise AI version (with AI Clear in full auto) For instance, I still love my 4/3s DSLR lens, the Zuiko 14-54 mm, and I still shoot with it mounted on my m43s cameras. One thing I like about DXO that I didn't mention in my other post on this is I can get geometric lens corrections for odd combinations of lenses and bodies. I think someone who values the built-in adjustability of the Topaz tools over the 'no thinking required' of DXO could not be considered 'wrong'. But at a normal viewing level, I'm not convinced it matters all that much. The Demosaicing AI feature of DXO may play a part in overall detail retention on some photos, however. BUT, with Topaz, I can make adjustments to narrow that gap considerably. DXO PureRaw is a bit sharper than AI Clear mode in full auto, at an extreme zoom level. There's not a lot of difference! Certainly, not enough to matter in my mind.

Download dxo pureraw 3 vs topaz photo ai